factoryhilt.blogg.se

1. #Ubuntu desktop vs ubuntu server install#
2. #Ubuntu desktop vs ubuntu server driver#
3. #Ubuntu desktop vs ubuntu server upgrade#
4. #Ubuntu desktop vs ubuntu server software#

I could then copy back my documents from the USB caddy, and restore those browser settings.

#Ubuntu desktop vs ubuntu server install#

Booting from the Manjaro USB stick the install was painless, it even recognised I had an SSD and didn’t try to insist on a swap partition. Time to back up the settings for browsers and the like, then pull out Ubuntu disk and put it in a USB caddy before fitting the SSD. So one evening I downloaded the Manjaro GNOME ISO file, and unpacked a brand new Samsung SSD with a decent sized cache I’d bought for the purpose. Thus my time slot would have to be in my evening, and the machine would have to be usable the next morning.

#Ubuntu desktop vs ubuntu server upgrade#

If my upgrade went wrong in the morning I wouldn’t be able to schedule your Hackaday afternoon, which I do from my post here in Europe some time in the early morning for our server in California. This Machine Is My Livelihood It doesn’t matter where I am, Hackaday still needs to be edited.Īnyone who works for a repeating publication will tell you that their time structure is dictated by the rhythm of the publication.

It’s Arch but for cowards, and trying it on a few older machines it’s been a painless experience. I settled upon Manjaro as a good blend of up-to-date and fast, yet usable by mere mortals. Truth be told this hasn’t been an immediate process, I’ve been eyeing up other distros for a few months. I need my packages to be more up-to-date than that, indeed even more up-to-date than the Ubuntu versions.

#Ubuntu desktop vs ubuntu server software#

This would be great, but even the most ardent fan of Debian probably has to admit that sometimes versions of software in those repositories can be a bit fossilised.

This is for earning a living, not messing about with.Īn obvious choice would be another Debian based system, after all I’m very familiar with Debian on more than one architecture. I thus had to select a distro for which the installation is painless, the learning curve is minimal, and which doesn’t have too many neckbeard quirks. My problem when changing distros is that this machine is my livelihood, I can’t afford for anything to go wrong with it and any changeover has to be fast.

#Ubuntu desktop vs ubuntu server driver#

My daily driver is a middle-aged Dell laptop, it’s about five years old but because I invested in the highest spec I could at the time, with an i7 of the day and 16 gigabytes of memory it’s still a contender. I’d reached the point at which I knew our ways must part, and it was time to look for another distro. I don’t have to look far to identify the point at which they adopted Snap packages as the moment when it all went wrong. It had well and truly delivered on its promise of a painless Linux desktop for most of that time, but the most recent upgrades had rendered it slow and bloated, with applications taking minutes to load and USB peripherals such as my film scanner mysteriously stopping working. Traditional Linux distributions rely mostly on traditional package systems- deb, in Ubuntu’s case-while Ubuntu Core relies almost entirely on Canonical’s relatively new snap package format.Last week I penned a cheesy fake relationship breakup letter to Ubuntu, my Linux distribution of choice for the last 15 years or so. The key difference between regular Ubuntu and Ubuntu Core is the underlying architecture of the system. What is the difference between Ubuntu Server and core? It can serve up websites, file shares, and containers, as well as expand your company offerings with an incredible cloud presence. Ubuntu Server is a server operating system, developed by Canonical and open source programmers around the world, that works with nearly any hardware or virtualization platform. The “Server” CD avoids including what Ubuntu considers desktop packages (packages like X, Gnome or KDE), but does include server related packages (Apache2, Bind9 and so on). What’s the difference between desktop and server? The first difference is in the CD contents.